FREE ESSAY ON THOMAS MORE: THE HYPOCRITICAL MARTYR

THOMAS MORE: THE HYPOCRITICAL MARTYR

Thomas More: 
The Hypocritical Martyr
Thomas More should not be on the pedestal that people tend to put him. His stance against
the divorce that King Henry VIII wanted does not make him righteous or even close to it.
More felt that divorce would go against the principles of the Bible, yet his work,
Utopia, also goes against the teachings of the Bible. Just as Henry wanted to create his
own church to satisfy his own needs, More's Utopia is a society created to fit his
needs.
To begin, we must look at the utterly blasphemous comment that More makes relating his
Utopian society to Christ. And I have no doubt that either self-interest, or the
authority of our Saviour Christ ...would have led the whole world to adopt the Utopian
system long ago (More 131). With this comment, More is saying that he knows what is best
over Christ, his God. He is in the same boat with King Henry, who created his own church
feeling that he knew better than God that divorce was correct. The only way More could
prove his bold claim is to align his society with the teachings of the Bible. The only
problem is that he fails to do this.
More's first attempt to making his claim correct was close to the teachings of the Bible.
When writing through the character Raphael, he claims that the Utopians view that,
happiness is the summum bonum towards which we're naturally impelled by virtue- which in
their definition means following one's natural impulses, as God meant us to do (More 91).
This is true when you consider the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve were given all of the
needs and desires of their hearts, before they turned their backs on God and ate from the
tree of knowledge. This introduced sin into the world, which made man's natural impulse
to follow his own way and sin against God. The footnote given in the text says that the
quote is an Epicurean view. Epicureans were pleasure seekers who were fully devoted to
sensual pleasure. Christ would not have accepted this behavior. The Bible states in Col
2:23: Such [basic principles of the world] indeed have an appearance of wisdom... but
they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence. It teaches that the senses, which
are naturally in all humans, should be controlled. Jesus himself was tempted for 40 days
and nights straight, but did not give in to seeking pleasure in those temptations. The
Utopians could be free to seek pleasure anywhere if sin was not in the world, but it is.
Christ knew this, and therefore would not subscribe to the society's beliefs.
More again tries to make his society closely related with the teachings of Christ in the
way Utopia tries to rid itself of greediness. He felt that social organization was to
blame for greediness: No living creature is naturally greedy, except from fear of want...
but there's no scope for that sort of thing in Utopia (More 80). Again, this is not true
according to the Bible. Eve was greedy by eating the fruit of knowledge so that she would
have the wisdom of God. Since Eve was the first woman in creation according to the Bible
(which Thomas More himself embraced) and she was greedy, it is safe to say that all
humans are naturally greedy. By More saying that no living creature is naturally greedy,
he is saying that there is some good in us, which is not true according to the Bible.
Romans 3:12 says, All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no
one who does good, not even one. More has a point that greed is wrong and we should not
be greedy, but to think that we begin in life with some amount of good is against the
teachings of the Bible, and therefore would not prompt Christ to accept this perfect
society.
Towards the end of the book, Utopia becomes somewhat of a heaven on earth as it begins to
sit on the judgement seat of God in a sense. Utopia does not believe in war and will do
anything they can to get out of fighting. One method they have adopted is hiring
Venalians (who are savages) to fight their wars for them. The feeling towards the
Venalians is not fond, and they cannot stand them. They say, if only they could wipe the
filthy scum off the face of the earth completely, they'd be doing the human race a very
good turn (More 113). They are judging and basically condemning these people as worthless
and inferior. The Bible states in James 4:12, There is only one Lawgiver and judge, the
one who is able to save and destroy. But you, who are you to judge your neighbor? This
attitude is against the Bible. Even in John 3:17, Christ states, For God did not send his
Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Not only is
this attitude an act of judgment or condemnation, but one that justifies killing someone,
which is against the ten commandments. How could Christ accept this society when it is
against the Bible? Even he knew that judging people and condemning people was wrong and
he was the Son of God. How can the Utopians do it?
Although Thomas More sought to devise a better society, it is absolutely not one that the
Saviour Christ would endorse. It is almost as if More was under the impression that this
society would return the world back to the Garden of Eden, free of sin. More seems to be
suffering from a little case of self-righteousness in his book. For him to condemn the
actions of King Henry VIII as against the Bible, yet be willing to support Utopia is
bizzare to me. He died in defending the biblical principle that was against divorce. What
makes him any different than Henry? What if he were king? Would he be martyring Henry in
defense of his beliefs?