FREE ESSAY ON SOCRATES' TRIAL

SOCRATES' TRIAL

Socrates' First Accusers and Athenian Law 
Of all confrontations in political philosophy, the biggest is the conflict between 
philosophy and politics. The problem remains making philosophy friendly to politics. The

questioning of authoritative opinions is not easily accomplished nor is that realm of
philosophy - 
the pursuit of wisdom. Socrates was the instigator of the conflict. While the political
element 
takes place within opinions about political life, Socrates asks the question What is the
best 
regime and how should I live? Ancient thought is riddled with unknowns and can make no
such 
statement as how should I live. The Socratic philosophy offers an alternative and
prepares the 
way for the alternative of absolutes. This alternative is not without its' faults.
Socratic 
philosophy is plagued by a destructive element. It reduces the authoritative opinions
about 
political life but replaces it with nothing. This is the vital stem from which the
Apology of 
Socrates is written. Because of the stinging attack on Athenian life, and the opinions
they revere 
so highly, Socrates is placed on trial for his life. 
The question now, becomes why and in what manner did Socrates refute the gods and is 
he guilty? Socrates, himself, speaks out against the charges by saying Socrates does
injustice 
and is meddlesome, by investigating the things under the earth and the heavenly things,
and by 
making the weaker the stronger and by teaching others these things. This is the charge of
the 
old accusers. It is seen from an example in The Clouds. Strepsiades goes to Socrates in
order 
to learn how to persuade his son by making the weaker speech the stronger. Why does
Socrates 
remind the assembly about the old accusers? It appears improper for a man on trial to
bring about 
his other 'crimes'. Aristophanes, in particular; is implicated by Socrates as an old
accuser. For 
you yourselves used to see these things in the comedy of Aristophanes. The poets helped
to 
shape Greek culture. Poetry was passed on and perpetuated the city where thought
constantly 
2
changed. 
Philosophy begins in debunking what the city thinks they know in order to refute the god.

It is evident that Socrates is not interested in the gods. Socrates says, It is not part
of the same 
man to believe in daimonian and divine things. Socrates is subtly admitting his guilt.
Perhaps 
Socrates believes in gods, but if so, they are not the gods of the city. Socrates simply
denies that 
he has had any part in celestial or subterranean inquiry - he simply speaks elsewhere.
Socrates 
goes on to say that those who do are reported to be atheists. However, Socrates says,
Zeus does 
not even exist. Socrates replaces Zeus with nature, the permanent and necessary things 
accessible to reason. This is an outrage to any Athenian. To deny the gods is to deny
faith and 
ultimately the authoritarian opinions on which their politics is based. 
Why does Socrates think that he is being unjustly punished? Chaerophon had told 
Socrates that the Pythian Oracle had said that Socrates was the wisest man. Socrates
admits, I 
am conscious that I am not wise, either much or little. Socrates wonders what the riddle
is and 
sets out to refute the divination. This is a prime example of Socrates' impiousness as is
his 
statement in The Clouds where he states we don't credit Gods. He is attempting to refute
the 
god at Delphi. Socrates tries to aid his own defense by charging that what he does is in
devotion 
to the god. Even now I still go around seeking and investigating in accordance with the
god. 
Socrates makes this brash statement yet it is unfounded and untrue because it is not a
divine 
order for Socrates to pursue this line of investigation. In opposition, Socrates asserts
that the 
dominion did not oppose him. 
Socrates' impiety is not the only thing that resulted in his trial. Socrates was the
gadfly 
3
stinging the city of Athens. When Socrates proposes that the gods sent him on his quest,
he set 
out to prove it wrong. In the process, he questioned the politicians and those reported
to be 
wise. After finding that no one reported to be wise, was worthy of being called wise,
Socrates 
investigated further all the while perceiving with pain and fear that I was becoming
hated. The 
artisans, poets, and politicians all thought they were knowledgeable in the greatest
things, but 
in fact, did not know anything at all. They all say noble things but they know nothing of
which 
they speak. Socrates, in affirming that he ranked above them in wisdom, because he knew 
nothing, in fact became the oracle's main supporter. It must be noted that Socrates'
support of the 
city's god is based solely on his 'testing' of the oracle. Socrates accepts the oracle's
words, not on 
divine authority but because it passes his test of reason. 
The hatred of Socrates is extended, as the youth of Athens imitate him and make the 
elders look foolish by engaging in Socratic dialogue and showing up their ignorance. This
led to 
the charge that Socrates corrupted the youth. This too was added to the impiety charge.
Socrates 
says that the youth follow him of their own accord. 
In any event, one concludes that the Delphi Oracle was a definite turning point in 
Socrates' life. Perhaps it changes Socrates' interest from the physical and astronomical
studies 
with moral and political thought. This turning point brings Socrates into conflict with
the city of 
Athens. His doubt of the opinions taken on authority also concerned the city's god and
the city's 
laws. That made him dangerous in the eyes of the leaders. Socrates' thought was a painful
sting 
to the glorified convictions of human conduct that meant so much to the city. 
For Socrates, being executed was the only option available to him. Of course, his
friends, 
could have helped him to escape, but what that prove? It would only go against everything
that 
4
Socrates has taught. It would also defy everything that Socrates stood for in life.
Escaping 
punishment, would have been an unjust and cowardly act for him. Disobeying the law would
set 
a bad example for his fellow citizens. In addition, it would ruin his reputation for
being just and 
following the laws of the government.
Ultimately, Socrates believed that, although he was wrongfully accused, he was given a 
fair trial through the eyes of the law. The fact that he was given a fair trial means
that he was 
given a fair punishment. If Socrates' punishment had not carried out, justice would not
have 
been served. Escaping punishment would have caused a conflict between his teachings and
his 
actions. This would eradicate the moral reputation that Socrates had built for himself
throughout 
his life. The question he would have asked himself would have been, "What kind of example

would I be setting if I dishonored my own teachings?" He saw his punishment as a contract

between the government and himself, and he firmly believed that agreements should not be

broken. This is the same government that allowed him to live life as he chose, so why
harm an 
institution that benefited him?