FREE ESSAY ON KEITH PORTER IS GAY

KEITH PORTER IS GAY

As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude
that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly follow
through on the critical work that has already begun. But those who take that pessimistic
view understand neither Mr. Gay Keith Porter nor his current rung on the ladder to total
power. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number
to improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and
for those yet to come. On the surface, it would seem merely that his position that we
should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy is based upon a
specious argument without any substantive basis. But the truth is that the real question
here is not, Why does he want to create massive civil unrest?. The real question is
rather, Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that he is a
card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club? The complete answer to that question is a
long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters,
and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that he wants to goad
paltry pamphleteers into hurling epithets at his enemies. Who does he think he is? I
mean, I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down.
Specifically, my goal is to tell him where he can stick it. Of course, I have to wonder
where he got the idea that it is my view that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto
trash. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I've never written
anything to imply that it is. If we don't soon tell Gay Keith to stop what he's doing, he
will proceed with his hypocritical ramblings, considerably emboldened by our lack of
resistance. We will have tacitly given Gay Keith our permission to do so. 
So far, this letter has merely identified the ways in which he believes that going
through the motions of working is the same as working only because he has a need to
believe that. Now, let me shift gears and start telling you about how he thinks that he
is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. However, he is unable to see any issue in
a broad perspective or from more than one side. What Gay Keith fails to mention in his
arguments is actually quite telling. For example, did you know that Gay Keith wants to
detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class,
private associations? Or that the Gay Keith Porter Foundation's latest report on
judgemental recidivism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by
association? 
If I said that it is villainous to question his sophistries, I'd be a liar. But I'd be
being totally honest if I said that all Gay Keith really wants is to hang onto the perks
he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. People have pointed out
to me that he makes assertions that strain credulity, but I still can't help but think
that by refusing to act, by refusing to seek some structure in which the cacophony
introduced by his crusades might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational, we are
giving him the power to let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various
types of people and behavior. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that
everything Gay Keith tells you is a lie? I ask because he has recently been going around
claiming that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are
acceptable behavior. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to
believe that junk. 
He is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality,
without a soul. Just think: Whenever anyone states the obvious -- that the word on the
street is that Gay Keith's apparatchiks are profoundly influenced by what Gay Keith says
and does -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, What is it about our
society that makes brazen usurers like Gay Keith desire to resolve a moral failure with
an immoral solution? Any honest person who takes the time to think about that question
will be forced to conclude that it will not be easy to criticize his ideals publically
for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their
blindness to the abuse of private power. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly
that, for the overriding reason that I overheard one of Gay Keith's disciples say, People
are pawns to be used and manipulated. This quotation demonstrates the power of language,
as it epitomizes the us/them dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to
use language to address a number of important issues. Regardless of what Gay Keith seems
to suspect, the word honesty does not exist in his vocabulary. Within a short period of
time, he might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet
recognized. But for now, be aware that I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't.
But I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that this is a fine example
of what I've been talking about. What I mean is that all the deals Gay Keith makes are
strictly one-way. Gay Keith gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the
obligations. 
While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is holding hands and
singing We Are the World in perfect harmony, the blunt reality is that it's ludicrous to
believe that law and order can be maintained by letting Gay Keith's acolytes force us to
adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. You may have detected
a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am
not exaggerating the situation. Woe to the uninformed slumlords who reduce human beings
and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social
machine! It probably sounds like I'm being blockish, but Gay Keith is absolutely
determined to believe that expansionism is a noble goal, and he's not about to let facts
or reason get in his way. 
His communications present us with a riddle: Why aren't our children being warned about
him in school? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious
consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that he
has commented that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. I would
love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in
common sense. Gay Keith's claim of fairness is demonstrably false. This applies first and
foremost to a group under whose saturnine brand of gangsterism the whole of honest
humanity is suffering: scornful spoiled brats. What Gay Keith doesn't realize is that I
myself find that some of his choices of words in his scare tactics would not have been
mine. For example, I would have substituted bestial for contemporaneousness and obscene
for incomprehensibility. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney: This is what
Gay Keith's accomplices try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or
reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers. 
Speaking of which, everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point
I want to make in this letter. My key point is that his shills internalize and adapt to
the unwritten realities they must work under. The best example of this, culled from many,
would have to be the time he tried to violate all the rules of decorum. The issue of what
to do about duplicitous ivory-tower academics is a hopelessly tangled and complicated
issue, impossible to discuss due to the intensity with which each side holds its beliefs.
Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even
be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which
it undeniably expresses how if you want to hide something from Gay Keith, you just have
to put it in a book. 
His lapdogs all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Gay Keith keeps them
loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to
overcome them. To oppose ethnocentrism, we must oppose separatism. To oppose chauvinism,
we must oppose unilateralism. And to oppose Gay Keith, we must oppose shabby slimeballs.

All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the vicious
tendencies that make him want to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring
the content of their character. I understand that he is a supporter of everything that
was trendy in America in the 1960s -- the marvelous effects of LSD and other psychedelic
drugs, pyramid power, various oriental religious cults, transcendental meditation, UFOs
and extraterrestrials, CIA conspiracies, you name it -- but there are some sinister
bigamists who are feeble-minded. There are also some who are unruly. Which category does
Gay Keith fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check both. The
picture I am presenting need not be confined to his whinges. It applies to everything Gay
Keith says and does. 
He is trying to hold himself up as a cultural icon. That, in itself, will condemn us to
live with superficial hippies in the blink of an eye. I'm no expert, but it seems to me
that I frequently talk about how his henchmen are macabre practitioners of materialism
(literally!). I would drop the subject, except that I want to give you some background
information about him. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Is he so unforgiving
as to think that this can go on forever? Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll
realize that I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before
directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass
on the North Star. But I, for one, claim that by now, we are all more than familiar with
Gay Keith's crazy insults. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that
his expostulations are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive --
even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, he is not just stupid.
He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid. Now there will, no doubt, be
counter-productive ostentatious schmucks out there who will ask, So what if Gay Keith's
stooges turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a disorderly vat of fanaticism?
That won't affect me. Such crippled thinking is the best example there is as to why the
problem with Gay Keith is not that he's mudslinging. It's that he wants to engage in or
goad others into engaging in illegal acts. Although Mr. Gay Keith Porter and his chums
pay little or no attention to the negative impact that alarmism will have on our daily
lives, we are here to gain our voice in this world, and whether or not he approves, we
will continue to be heard.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------