FREE ESSAY ON A REVISIONIST PERSPECTIVE OF THE ELECTION OF THOMAS JEFFERSON

A REVISIONIST PERSPECTIVE OF THE ELECTION OF THOMAS JEFFERSON

The Election of Thomas Jefferson
Consensus historians paint Thomas Jefferson as the great father of democracy, referring
to his election to the presidency as the "revolution of 1800." In actuality, Thomas
Jefferson was an inconsistent man, who was philosophically against the Federalists, but
who did not bring about any significant political or ideological changes during his
presidency. Recently, revisionist historians have begun to question the notion of
Jefferson as the "representative of the common man." Many of these historians now agree
that Jefferson's life was wrought with contradictions, and that his policies, as a
president, actually reflected a synthesis of the Federalist and Republican ideologies.
"We are all republicans, we are all federalists," Jefferson stated in his first inaugural
address. Many Americans were shocked to hear those words come out of the same mouth that
had supported the bloody conflicts of the French Revolution years before. Jefferson's
many political theories, and personal letters, sometimes reflected an interest in the
common man and democracy, while his actual practices were drastically different.
Politically, the Jeffersonian party was insecure and inconsistent. After being elected
president, Jefferson did nothing to increase the level of democracy in the government.
Traditionally, the Jeffersonian movement and the Republican Party have been seen as
anti-capitalist, promoting the interests of the common man, and favoring a strict
interpretation of the constitution. The Hamiltonian movement and the Federalist Party
represented the elite capitalist class, favoring a concentration of power in the State,
and a loose interpretation of the constitution. Revisionist historians have argued
against this view. They argue that the Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian movements are not
significantly different, but rather each represents different factions of elites. There
are numerous examples that show the accuracy of this revisionist view. In the election of
1800, the federalists were forced to vote for one of the two Republicans running. Many of
them favored Burr, as the less extreme of the two, until Hamilton convinced them of
Jefferson's moderate intents. "He [Jefferson] is as likely as any man I know to
temporize- to calculate what will be likely to promote his own reputation and advantage;
and the probable result of such a temper is the preservation of the systems, though
originally opposed, which, being once established, could not be overturned without danger
to the person who did it." The revisionist perspective that Thomas Jefferson did not
represent the masses, but merely a different faction of elites, has much supporting
evidence. Jefferson's interests in the common farmer were second to those of the Southern
landowner. Jefferson deviated even from this prospective, crossing the line on many
issues into what would seem Federalist actions. One historian, Peter S. Onuf, went so far
as to dub it "Jeffersonian Federalism." One example of this is the Louisiana Purchase.
Jefferson deviated from his strict interpretation of the constitution in order to
purchase Louisiana, which would benefit land speculators and Northern capitalists,
telling the Senate to ratify it "with as little debate as possible, and particularly so
far as respects the constitutional difficulty." Morton Borden points out in his essay,
"Thomas Jefferson: political compromiser," that Jefferson took a decisively Federalist
approach to the military as well, contrary to what many Federalists thought would happen.
In less than three months after being elected, Jefferson attacked the Barbary pirates
without asking permission from Congress. Many of Jefferson's political compromises were
reflected in his economic decisions.
One of the main contradictions of the Jefferson administration was its adoption of
Federalist economic policies. Jefferson had no clear economic plan; he theorized about
the adoption of a laissez-faire policy, and the destruction of the Hamiltonian system,
but did nothing about this as president. Jefferson, by and large, maintained the
Federalist system throughout his presidency. One of the first things Jefferson did was to
abolish the hated excise taxes on whiskey. In order to do this, he had to find another
way to acquire funds. Thus he justified increasing protective tariffs. This rendered the
abolition of the whiskey tax merely cosmetic, as the direct tax was reduced, but the
prices of all commodities were raised. Jefferson also had the national bank destroyed,
but re-instituted it in 1816 in order to raise national funds. His party's legislature
began to issue charters freely to local banks. Jefferson made no attempts to put an end
to many parts of the existing federalist system, such as land speculation on public land.
In addition Jefferson developed the infrastructure, spending $20 million on a network of
national roads and canals. Hoffsteter states, "Since his policies did not deviate too
widely from the federalists, Jefferson hoped to win over the moderates from their
ranks...soon the republican machines began flirting with the financial interests they
were sworn to oppose." 
Through examining his personal letters and private life, we find many serious
inconsistencies in Jefferson's ideologies. One issue that has been scrutinized lately is
Jefferson's views on slavery and women. Many consensus historians argue that Jefferson
was a benevolent slave owner, and advocated for the abolition of slavery. A revisionist
historian will continue to tell you that while he wanted to abolish slavery, he stated
that blacks and whites could never both live freely in the same society. As Conor Cruise
O'Brien pointed out in his article, "Thomas Jefferson: Radical and Racist," "In theory
Jefferson's solution to slavery consisted in "colonization": the deportation of all the
freed blacks from the United States." Jefferson never considered a form of racial
coexistence, and believed adamantly that blacks were inferior. "This unfortunate
difference of color, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation
of these people," Jefferson wrote in his Notes on Virginia. This plan for "colonization"
was extremely impractical, and was never a potential option. Jefferson acknowledged this
himself later in life, and altered his plan, proposing that the government buy newborn
slaves, and pay for them to be raised to an appropriate age by their parents, at which
point they would start working to recompense the government until they could be sent
away. O'Brien also puts emphasis on the fact that Jefferson examined blacks for
characteristics of inferiority. Jefferson once stated that black males preferred white
women for sex, while black females preferred orangutans. Richard Hoffsteter comments on
the subject, "[Jefferson] could say that a man's rights were "unalienable" at the very
moment when he owned several dozen souls." A related issue is that of his sexual
relationship with his mulatto slave Sally Hemings. In her book, Thomas Jefferson and
Sally Hemings, Annette Gordon-Reed gives substantial evidence concerning the thirty-sever
year abusive liaison between Jefferson, and his slave, Sally Hemings. She also goes on to
describe his views on women in general. Jefferson did not believe that women should be
educated in the same way as men. He stated that the object of their education should be
to make them better company for men. In addition, many people would be surprised to learn
of Jefferson's attitude towards the common people. While in some of his theories he
stated that he had faith in the common farmer, he also shared the same fear of the masses
as the Federalists. He did not believe that the government could rely on man's virtue.
Many historians are outraged by the terms with which he referred to the masses, calling
them "swinish multitudes" in one letter and "canaille" in another. Jefferson believed
that the government must be able to check the people. Many Americans are shocked to learn
of the complete hypocrisy of the "father of democracy's" ideologies towards slaves,
women, and the masses.
Thomas Jefferson is often described by revisionist historians as having "outfederalized
the Federalists." This is the antithesis of the belief held by many historians that the
election of Thomas Jefferson was a "revolution," In actuality there were no significant
political, economic, or ideological changes made. Some of Jefferson's theories and
political writings deserve merit for advocating human rights and democracy, while his
actions deserve condemnation for disregarding his own philosophical beliefs in order to
remain popular. Jefferson was both contradictory and inconsistent, often synthesizing
Federalist and Republican policies.